↓ Skip to main content

A relationship between Pseudomonal growth behaviour and cystic fibrosis patient lung function identified in a metabolomic investigation

Overview of attention for article published in Metabolomics, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
A relationship between Pseudomonal growth behaviour and cystic fibrosis patient lung function identified in a metabolomic investigation
Published in
Metabolomics, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11306-013-0538-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justyna Kozlowska, Damian W. Rivett, Louic S. Vermeer, Mary P. Carroll, Kenneth D. Bruce, A. James Mason, Geraint B. Rogers

Abstract

Chronic polymicrobial lung infections in adult cystic fibrosis patients are typically dominated by high levels of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Determining the impact of P. aeruginosa growth on airway secretion composition is fundamental to understanding both the behaviour of this pathogen in vivo, and its relationship with other potential colonising species. We hypothesised that the marked differences in the phenotypes of clinical isolates would be reflected in the metabolite composition of spent culture media. (1)H NMR spectroscopy was used to characterise the impact of P. aeruginosa growth on a synthetic medium as part of an in vitro CF lower airways model system. Comparisons of 15 CF clinical isolates were made and four distinct metabolomic clusters identified. Highly significant relationships between P. aeruginosa isolate cluster membership and both patient lung function (FEV1) and spent culture pH were identified. This link between clinical isolate growth behaviour and FEV1 indicates characterisation of P. aeruginosa growth may find application in predicting patient lung function while the significant divergence in metabolite production and consumption observed between CF clinical isolates suggests dominant isolate characteristics have the potential to play both a selective role in microbiota composition and influence pseudomonal behaviour in vivo.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 5%
Unknown 56 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 27%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Researcher 5 8%
Professor 5 8%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Chemistry 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 6 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2014.
All research outputs
#15,296,915
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from Metabolomics
#902
of 1,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,475
of 192,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metabolomics
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.