| Title |
Integrating effects of supplementary feeding, poisoning, pollutant ingestion and wind farms of two vulture species in Spain using a population viability analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ornithology, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10336-011-0671-8 |
| Authors |
Clara García-Ripollés, Pascual López-López |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 117 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 15% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 56 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 35 | 28% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,407,006
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#696
of 1,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,239
of 108,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.