You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Epidemiology of Masked and White-Coat Hypertension: The Family-Based SKIPOGH Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0092522 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heba Alwan, Menno Pruijm, Belen Ponte, Daniel Ackermann, Idris Guessous, Georg Ehret, Jan A. Staessen, Kei Asayama, Philippe Vuistiner, Sandrine Estoppey Younes, Fred Paccaud, Grégoire Wuerzner, Antoinette Pechere-Bertschi, Markus Mohaupt, Bruno Vogt, Pierre-Yves Martin, Michel Burnier, Murielle Bochud |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 25% |
| Unknown | 16 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2014.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#186,369
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,987
of 241,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#4,240
of 5,426 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,426 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.