↓ Skip to main content

Inappropriate prescribing in patients accessing specialist palliative day care services

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Inappropriate prescribing in patients accessing specialist palliative day care services
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11096-014-9932-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Todd, H. Nazar, S. Pearson, I. Andrew, L. Baker, A. Husband

Abstract

Background For patients accessing specialist palliative care day services, medication is prescribed routinely to manage acute symptoms, treat long-term conditions or prevent adverse events associated with these conditions. As such, the pharmacotherapeutic burden for these patients is high and polypharmacy is common. Consequently, the risk of these patients developing drug-related toxicities through drug-drug interactions is exacerbated. Medication use in this group should, therefore, be evaluated regularly to align with achievable therapeutic outcomes considering remaining life expectancy. Objective To (1) assess the prevalence of inappropriate medication use; (2) identify potential drug-drug interactions; and, (3) determine how many potential drug-drug interactions could be prevented by discontinuing inappropriate medication. Setting A specialist tertiary care palliative care centre in Northern England serving a population of 330,000. Main outcome measure Prescribing of inappropriate medication. Method Medication histories for patients accessing a specialist palliative day care centre were established and a modified Delphi method was used to reach consensus of medication appropriateness. The Delphi method utilized a framework considering the following factors: remaining life expectancy of the patient, time until benefit of the treatment, goals of care and treatment targets. Potential drug interactions were established using drug interaction recognition software and categorised by their ability to cause harm. Results A total number of 132 patients were assessed during the study period who were prescribed 1,532 (mean = 12/patient) medications; 238 (16 %) were considered inappropriate in the context of limited life expectancy. The most common class of medications considered inappropriate were the statins, observed in 35 (27 %) patients. A total of 267 potential drug-drug interactions were identified; 112 were clinically significant and 155 were not considered clinically significant. Discontinuation of inappropriate medication would reduce the total number of medications taken to 1,294 (mean = 10/patient) and prevent 31 clinically significant potential drug-drug interactions. Conclusion Patients accessing specialist palliative day care services take many inappropriate medications. These medications not only increase the pharmacotherapeutic burden for the patient but they also contribute to potential drug-drug interactions. These patients should have their medication reviewed in the context of life limiting illness aligned with achievable therapeutic outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 14%
Researcher 11 13%
Other 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 14%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 15 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2015.
All research outputs
#3,353,506
of 24,289,456 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#161
of 1,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,011
of 228,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,289,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.