You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impact of funding deadlines on personal workloads, stress and family relationships: a qualitative study of Australian researchers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004462 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Danielle L Herbert, John Coveney, Philip Clarke, Nicholas Graves, Adrian G Barnett |
| Abstract |
To examine the impact of applying for funding on personal workloads, stress and family relationships. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 341 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 102 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 34 | 10% |
| United States | 16 | 5% |
| Canada | 8 | 2% |
| Germany | 7 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 6 | 2% |
| Spain | 5 | 1% |
| Belgium | 4 | 1% |
| Curaçao | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 27 | 8% |
| Unknown | 129 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 169 | 50% |
| Scientists | 146 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 3% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 27% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 14 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 24% |
| Unknown | 21 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 269. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2023.
All research outputs
#136,475
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#259
of 25,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,072
of 239,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#3
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.