↓ Skip to main content

Helping women to good health: breast cancer, omega-3/omega-6 lipids, and related lifestyle factors

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Helping women to good health: breast cancer, omega-3/omega-6 lipids, and related lifestyle factors
Published in
BMC Medicine, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-12-54
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michel de Lorgeril, Patricia Salen

Abstract

In addition to genetic predisposition and sex hormone exposure, physical activity and a healthy diet play important roles in breast cancer (BC). Increased intake of omega-3 fatty acids (n-3) associated with decreased omega-6 (n-6), resulting in a higher n-3/n-6 ratio compared with the western diet, are inversely associated with BC risk, as shown by Yang et al. in their meta-analysis in BMC Cancer. High consumption of polyphenols and organic foods increase the n-3/n-6 ratio, and in turn may decrease BC risk. Intake of high fiber foods and foods with low glycemic index decreases insulin resistance and diabetes risk, and in turn may decrease BC risk. The modernized Mediterranean diet is an effective strategy for combining these recommendations, and this dietary pattern reduces overall cancer risk and specifically BC risk. High-risk women should also eliminate environmental endocrine disruptors, including those from foods. Drugs that decrease the n-3/n-6 ratio or that are suspected of increasing BC or diabetes risk should be used with great caution by high-risk women and women wishing to decrease their BC risk.Please see related article: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/14/105/abstract.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 105 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 23%
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 5%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 23 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 29 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2022.
All research outputs
#6,416,297
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,453
of 3,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,812
of 227,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#37
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.