↓ Skip to main content

A review of plantar heel pain of neural origin: Differential diagnosis and management

Overview of attention for article published in Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
409 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review of plantar heel pain of neural origin: Differential diagnosis and management
Published in
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, March 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.math.2007.01.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ali M. Alshami, Tina Souvlis, Michel W. Coppieters

Abstract

Plantar heel pain is a symptom commonly encountered by clinicians. Several conditions such as plantar fasciitis, calcaneal fracture, rupture of the plantar fascia and atrophy of the heel fat pad may lead to plantar heel pain. Injury to the tibial nerve and its branches in the tarsal tunnel and in the foot is also a common cause. Entrapment of these nerves may play a role in both the early phases of plantar heel pain and recalcitrant cases. Although the contribution of nerve entrapment to plantar heel pain has been well documented in the literature, its pathophysiology, diagnosis and management are still controversial. Therefore, the purpose of this article was to critically review the available literature on plantar heel pain of neural origin. Possible sites of nerve entrapment, effectiveness of diagnostic clinical tests and electrodiagnostic tests, differential diagnoses for plantar heel pain, and conservative and surgical treatment will be discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 409 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
Canada 4 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 387 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 69 17%
Other 58 14%
Student > Postgraduate 54 13%
Student > Bachelor 41 10%
Researcher 34 8%
Other 100 24%
Unknown 53 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 210 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 82 20%
Sports and Recreations 21 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Engineering 5 1%
Other 24 6%
Unknown 58 14%