↓ Skip to main content

Molecular mechanisms of pyrethroid insecticide neurotoxicity: recent advances

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
423 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
444 Mendeley
Title
Molecular mechanisms of pyrethroid insecticide neurotoxicity: recent advances
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, June 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00204-011-0726-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

David M. Soderlund

Abstract

Synthetic pyrethroid insecticides were introduced into widespread use for the control of insect pests and disease vectors more than three decades ago. In addition to their value in controlling agricultural pests, pyrethroids are at the forefront of efforts to combat malaria and other mosquito-borne diseases and are also common ingredients of household insecticide and companion animal ectoparasite control products. The abundance and variety of pyrethroid uses contribute to the risk of exposure and adverse effects in the general population. The insecticidal actions of pyrethroids depend on their ability to bind to and disrupt voltage-gated sodium channels of insect nerves. Sodium channels are also important targets for the neurotoxic effects of pyrethroids in mammals but other targets, particularly voltage-gated calcium and chloride channels, have been implicated as alternative or secondary sites of action for a subset of pyrethroids. This review summarizes information published during the past decade on the action of pyrethroids on voltage-gated sodium channels as well as on voltage-gated calcium and chloride channels and provides a critical re-evaluation of the role of these three targets in pyrethroid neurotoxicity based on this information.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 444 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 433 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 14%
Student > Bachelor 50 11%
Researcher 45 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 4%
Other 70 16%
Unknown 137 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 107 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 10%
Environmental Science 27 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 6%
Chemistry 24 5%
Other 65 15%
Unknown 150 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,158,758
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#63
of 2,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,906
of 116,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.