↓ Skip to main content

Do-it-yourself biology: challenges and promises for an open science and technology movement

Overview of attention for article published in Systems and Synthetic Biology, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Do-it-yourself biology: challenges and promises for an open science and technology movement
Published in
Systems and Synthetic Biology, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11693-013-9116-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Landrain, Morgan Meyer, Ariel Martin Perez, Remi Sussan

Abstract

The do-it-yourself biology (DIYbio) community is emerging as a movement that fosters open access to resources permitting modern molecular biology, and synthetic biology among others. It promises in particular to be a source of cheaper and simpler solutions for environmental monitoring, personal diagnostic and the use of biomaterials. The successful growth of a global community of DIYbio practitioners will depend largely on enabling safe access to state-of-the-art molecular biology tools and resources. In this paper we analyze the rise of DIYbio, its community, its material resources and its applications. We look at the current projects developed for the international genetically engineered machine competition in order to get a sense of what amateur biologists can potentially create in their community laboratories over the coming years. We also show why and how the DIYbio community, in the context of a global governance development, is putting in place a safety/ethical framework for guarantying the pursuit of its activity. And finally we argue that the global spread of DIY biology potentially reconfigures and opens up access to biological information and laboratory equipment and that, therefore, it can foster new practices and transversal collaborations between professional scientists and amateurs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 2%
Canada 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 240 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 17%
Student > Bachelor 45 17%
Student > Master 39 15%
Researcher 37 14%
Other 16 6%
Other 42 16%
Unknown 34 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 12%
Social Sciences 28 11%
Engineering 21 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 5%
Other 66 26%
Unknown 37 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,267,030
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Systems and Synthetic Biology
#2
of 99 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,282
of 199,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systems and Synthetic Biology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them