You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A pragmatic randomized trial of a polypill-based strategy to improve use of indicated preventive treatments in people at high cardiovascular disease risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1177/2047487314530382 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anushka Patel, Alan Cass, David Peiris, Tim Usherwood, Alex Brown, Stephen Jan, Bruce Neal, Graham S Hillis, Natasha Rafter, Andrew Tonkin, Ruth Webster, Laurent Billot, Severine Bompoint, Carol Burch, Hugh Burke, Noel Hayman, Barbara Molanus, Christopher M Reid, Louise Shiel, Samantha Togni, Anthony Rodgers, for the Kanyini Guidelines Adherence with the Polypill Collaboration |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 201 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 17% |
| Researcher | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 14% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 17% |
| Unknown | 47 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 35% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 16% |
| Unknown | 60 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,391,897
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
#622
of 2,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,498
of 242,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.