↓ Skip to main content

Developing seed zones and transfer guidelines with multivariate regression trees

Overview of attention for article published in Tree Genetics & Genomes, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Developing seed zones and transfer guidelines with multivariate regression trees
Published in
Tree Genetics & Genomes, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11295-010-0341-7
Authors

Andreas Hamann, Tim Gylander, Pei-yu Chen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 111 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 21%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 6 5%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 53%
Environmental Science 24 20%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 21 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,534,941
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from Tree Genetics & Genomes
#84
of 315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,451
of 99,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tree Genetics & Genomes
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 315 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them