| Title |
First outbreak of pitch canker in a South African pine plantation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Australasian Plant Pathology, May 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1071/ap07017 |
| Authors |
T. A. Coutinho, E. T. Steenkamp, K. Mongwaketsi, M. Wilmot, M. J. Wingfield |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 3 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 19% |
| Researcher | 7 | 15% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 21% |
| Unknown | 13 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 50% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Australasian Plant Pathology
#84
of 441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,533
of 90,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australasian Plant Pathology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 441 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them