↓ Skip to main content

Probiotics in respiratory virus infections

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Probiotics in respiratory virus infections
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10096-014-2086-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Lehtoranta, A. Pitkäranta, R. Korpela

Abstract

Viral respiratory infections are the most common diseases in humans. A large range of etiologic agents challenge the development of efficient therapies. Research suggests that probiotics are able to decrease the risk or duration of respiratory infection symptoms. However, the antiviral mechanisms of probiotics are unclear. The purpose of this paper is to review the current knowledge on the effects of probiotics on respiratory virus infections and to provide insights on the possible antiviral mechanisms of probiotics. A PubMed and Scopus database search was performed up to January 2014 using appropriate search terms on probiotic and respiratory virus infections in cell models, in animal models, and in humans, and reviewed for their relevance. Altogether, thirty-three clinical trials were reviewed. The studies varied highly in study design, outcome measures, probiotics, dose, and matrices used. Twenty-eight trials reported that probiotics had beneficial effects in the outcome of respiratory tract infections (RTIs) and five showed no clear benefit. Only eight studies reported investigating viral etiology from the respiratory tract, and one of these reported a significant decrease in viral load. Based on experimental studies, probiotics may exert antiviral effects directly in probiotic-virus interaction or via stimulation of the immune system. Although probiotics seem to be beneficial in respiratory illnesses, the role of probiotics on specific viruses has not been investigated sufficiently. Due to the lack of confirmatory studies and varied data available, more randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trials in different age populations investigating probiotic dose response, comparing probiotic strains/genera, and elucidating the antiviral effect mechanisms are necessary.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 207 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 15%
Student > Bachelor 31 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Student > Master 18 9%
Lecturer 10 5%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 63 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 5%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 71 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,005,936
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#217
of 2,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,359
of 244,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#4
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.