↓ Skip to main content

Perceptual impairment and psychomotor control in virtual laparoscopic surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Perceptual impairment and psychomotor control in virtual laparoscopic surgery
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00464-010-1546-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark R. Wilson, John S. McGrath, Samuel J. Vine, James Brewer, David Defriend, Richard S. W. Masters

Abstract

It is recognised that one of the major difficulties in performing laparoscopic surgery is the translation of two-dimensional video image information to a three-dimensional working area. However, research has tended to ignore the gaze and eye-hand coordination strategies employed by laparoscopic surgeons as they attempt to overcome these perceptual constraints. This study sought to examine if measures related to tool movements, gaze strategy, and eye-hand coordination (the quiet eye) differentiate between experienced and novice operators performing a two-handed manoeuvres task on a virtual reality laparoscopic surgical simulator (LAP Mentor™).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 133 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Other 9 7%
Other 34 25%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 26%
Engineering 19 14%
Psychology 17 12%
Computer Science 11 8%
Sports and Recreations 6 4%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 29 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2014.
All research outputs
#15,197,413
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,585
of 6,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,581
of 109,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#25
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,263 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.