| Title |
Effects of interventions on survival in acute respiratory distress syndrome: an umbrella review of 159 published randomized trials and 29 meta-analyses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-014-3272-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adriano R. Tonelli, Joe Zein, Jacob Adams, John P. A. Ioannidis |
| Abstract |
Multiple interventions have been tested in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We examined the entire agenda of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in ARDS that reported on mortality and of respective meta-analyses. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Italy | 1 | 14% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 176 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 14% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 50 | 27% |
| Unknown | 32 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 8% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 43 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2014.
All research outputs
#5,954,875
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,509
of 4,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,483
of 224,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#36
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.