↓ Skip to main content

Microbial Community Structure and Function Decoupling Across a Phosphorus Gradient in Streams

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Ecology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Microbial Community Structure and Function Decoupling Across a Phosphorus Gradient in Streams
Published in
Microbial Ecology, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00248-017-1039-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erick S. LeBrun, Ryan S. King, Jeffrey A. Back, Sanghoon Kang

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) is a key biological element with important and unique biogeochemical cycling in natural ecosystems. Anthropogenic phosphorus inputs have been shown to greatly affect natural ecosystems, and this has been shown to be especially true of freshwater systems. While the importance of microbial communities in the P cycle is widely accepted, the role, composition, and relationship to P of these communities in freshwater systems still hold many secrets. Here, we investigated combined bacterial and archaeal communities utilizing 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing and computationally predicted functional metagenomes (PFMs) in 25 streams representing a strong P gradient. We discovered that 16S rRNA community structure and PFMs demonstrate a degree of decoupling between structure and function in the system. While we found that total phosphorus (TP) was correlated to the structure and functional capability of bacterial and archaeal communities in the system, turbidity had a stronger, but largely independent, correlation. At TP levels of approximately 55 μg/L, we see sharp differences in the abundance of numerous ecologically important taxa related to vegetation, agriculture, sediment, and other ecosystem inhabitants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 28%
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Master 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 14 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 28%
Environmental Science 17 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 16 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2019.
All research outputs
#4,231,587
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#455
of 2,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,449
of 315,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#17
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.