↓ Skip to main content

Clinical and Molecular Characterization of Prader-Willi Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Indian Journal of Pediatrics, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Clinical and Molecular Characterization of Prader-Willi Syndrome
Published in
Indian Journal of Pediatrics, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12098-017-2386-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. N. Sanjeeva, Madhuri Maganthi, Himabindu Kodishala, Rohit Kumar R. Marol, Pooja S. Kulshreshtha, Elisa Lorenzetto, Jayarama S. Kadandale, Uros Hladnik, P. Raghupathy, Meenakshi Bhat

Abstract

To describe the clinical presentations and molecular diagnosis to aid the clinicians in early diagnosis and appropriate management of Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS). Thirty-four clinically diagnosed PWS cases were enrolled after obtaining informed consent/assent. Demographic details, clinical data and anthropometry were recorded using structured proforma. The facial dysmorphology was evaluated. Appropriate genetic testing was performed to confirm the diagnosis. At diagnosis, the most common clinical features included obesity (59%) and short stature (53%). Distinct dysmorphic features were observed in 67%. Neonatal hypotonia with feeding difficulty, delayed development in infancy and childhood behavioral problems were reported in 94%, 94% and 74% respectively. Food seeking behavior and hyperphagia was reported in 67%. Seizures were reported in 47%. All children had underdeveloped external genitalia. Growth hormone (GH) deficiency and impaired glucose tolerance were found in 56% and 50% respectively. Sleep related problems were seen in 67%. Skin and rectal picking were reported in 67%. FISH confirmed micro-deletion was found in 64.7% and abnormal methylation in 35%, of which uniparental disomy was confirmed in 14.7%. Clinical suspicion is vital for early detection of PWS. Confirmation of the diagnosis requires complex multi-tier molecular genetic testing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 19%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 19 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 22 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2017.
All research outputs
#18,562,247
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#1,127
of 1,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,357
of 315,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#17
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,550 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.