↓ Skip to main content

Orchestration of hepatocellular carcinoma development by diverse liver cancer stem cells

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gastroenterology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Orchestration of hepatocellular carcinoma development by diverse liver cancer stem cells
Published in
Journal of Gastroenterology, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00535-014-0951-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taro Yamashita, Shuichi Kaneko

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the world's most aggressive diseases and carries a poor prognosis for patients. Recent evidence suggests that HCC is organized by cancer stem cells (CSCs), which are a subset of cells with stem cell-like features. CSCs are considered a pivotal target for the eradication of cancer, and liver CSCs have been investigated using various stem cell markers. Several hepatic stem/progenitor markers have been shown to be useful for isolating putative CSCs from HCC, although the expression patterns and phenotypic diversity of CSCs purified by these markers remain obscure. Recently, we found that liver CSCs defined by different markers show unique features of tumorigenicity and metastasis, with phenotypes closely associated with committed liver lineages. Furthermore, our data suggest that these distinct CSCs collaborate to orchestrate the tumorigenicity and metastasis of HCC. In this review article, we summarize the recent advances in understanding the pathogenesis and heterogeneity of liver CSCs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Researcher 5 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 10 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Psychology 3 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2014.
All research outputs
#15,298,293
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastroenterology
#735
of 1,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,749
of 223,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastroenterology
#10
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,082 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.