↓ Skip to main content

Fostering biocultural diversity in landscapes through place-based food networks: a “solution scan” of European and Japanese models

Overview of attention for article published in Sustainability Science, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
Title
Fostering biocultural diversity in landscapes through place-based food networks: a “solution scan” of European and Japanese models
Published in
Sustainability Science, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11625-017-0455-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tobias Plieninger, Ryo Kohsaka, Claudia Bieling, Shizuka Hashimoto, Chiho Kamiyama, Thanasis Kizos, Marianne Penker, Pia Kieninger, Brian J. Shaw, Giles Bruno Sioen, Yuki Yoshida, Osamu Saito

Abstract

Many Japanese and European landscapes harbor biocultural diversity that has been shaped by human agency over centuries. However, these landscapes are threatened by widespread land abandonment, land-use changes, and urbanization. The aim of this study is to use a "solution scanning" method to identify place-based food networks in Europe and Japan that reinforce linkages between biological and cultural diversity in landscapes. In our analysis of 26 European and 13 Japanese cases, we find that place-based food networks are typically located in heterogeneous landscapes, are driven by civil society (and less by markets), and act at a local scale. Regional identity is the most frequently addressed societal issue. Scenery, rural tourism, and nature conservation are more important motivations in Europe, and physical well-being and revitalization of local economies are more relevant in Japan. European models are typically associated with achieving biodiversity conservation and socio-cultural tradition outcomes, and Japanese models more with public health and nutrition outcomes. We discuss the potential for transfer of approaches from Japan to Europe (e.g., models that tackle the aging of rural societies), and from Europe to Japan (e.g., models that build explicit connections between food production and biodiversity conservation). We conclude with a list of recommended policy measures, e.g., the creation of a flexible legal framework that protects the interests of and reduces political constraints for collaborative efforts to biocultural diversity in landscapes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 230 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 15%
Researcher 34 15%
Student > Master 33 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Student > Bachelor 12 5%
Other 45 20%
Unknown 60 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 49 21%
Social Sciences 29 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 3%
Engineering 8 3%
Other 41 18%
Unknown 68 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,700,145
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Sustainability Science
#464
of 959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,258
of 328,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sustainability Science
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.