↓ Skip to main content

Hepatic Steatosis and Steatohepatitis: Are they Really Two Distinct Entities?

Overview of attention for article published in Current Hepatology Reports, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Hepatic Steatosis and Steatohepatitis: Are they Really Two Distinct Entities?
Published in
Current Hepatology Reports, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11901-014-0227-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cory M. Fielding, Paul Angulo

Abstract

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease affects nearly 30% of Americans. A histopathological spectrum exists from simple steatosis to NASH which may progress to cirrhosis and HCC. NASH is currently the third most common indication for liver transplant with increasing incidence. Steatosis can be considered the hepatic manifestation of the metabolic syndrome as insulin resistance is a major risk factor for its development. While liver biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis, non-invasive methods are currently being developed to appropriately determine who needs histologic evaluation. Management focuses on mitigation of risk factors, since targeted therapies to halt progression of fibrosis have not been validated. Simple steatosis does not affect overall survival, but NASH conveys increased mortality. Because of this, non-invasive strategies to diagnose patients and management algorithms are needed. This review supports the definitions of simple steatosis and NASH as two distinct entities based on pathophysiology, diagnosis, management, and prognosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 14 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 16 30%