↓ Skip to main content

Atrophic degeneration of cerebellum impairs both the reactive and the proactive control of movement in the stop signal paradigm

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Atrophic degeneration of cerebellum impairs both the reactive and the proactive control of movement in the stop signal paradigm
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00221-017-5027-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giusy Olivito, Emiliano Brunamonti, Silvia Clausi, Pierpaolo Pani, Francesca R. Chiricozzi, Margherita Giamundo, Marco Molinari, Maria Leggio, Stefano Ferraina

Abstract

The cognitive control of movement suppression, including performance monitoring, is one of the core properties of the executive system. A complex cortical and subcortical network involving cerebral cortex, thalamus, subthalamus, and basal ganglia has been regarded as the neural substrate of inhibition of programmed movements. Using the countermanding task, a suitable tool to explore behavioral components of movement suppression, the contribution of the cerebellum in the proactive control and monitoring of voluntary action has been recently described in patients affected by focal lesions involving in particular the cerebellar dentate nucleus. Here, we evaluated the performance on the countermanding task in a group of patients with cerebellar degeneration, in which the cerebellar cortex was diffusely affected, and showed that they display additionally a longer latency in countermanding engaged movements. Overall, the present data confirm the role of the cerebellum in executive control of action inhibition by extending the contribution to reactive motor suppression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 13 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 23%
Neuroscience 7 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 13 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2017.
All research outputs
#20,436,330
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#2,921
of 3,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,752
of 283,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#58
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.