| Title |
Why Gupta et al.’s critique of niche construction theory is off target
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Genetics, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12041-017-0797-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcus W. Feldman, John Odling-Smee, Kevin N. Laland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| India | 3 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Russia | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 58% |
| Scientists | 9 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 21% |
| Researcher | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 31% |
| Psychology | 5 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Philosophy | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 21% |
| Unknown | 18 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2017.
All research outputs
#2,217,931
of 25,196,456 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetics
#10
of 683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,005
of 320,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetics
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,196,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 683 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.