↓ Skip to main content

A Network Analysis Model for Disambiguation of Names in Lists

Overview of attention for article published in Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A Network Analysis Model for Disambiguation of Names in Lists
Published in
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, July 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10588-005-3940-3
Authors

Bradley Malin, Edoardo Airoldi, Kathleen M. Carley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 8%
Germany 2 4%
Switzerland 1 2%
Pakistan 1 2%
Turkey 1 2%
China 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 40 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 24%
Student > Master 8 16%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 31 61%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory
#30
of 96 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,891
of 57,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them