| Title |
Design of Freeze-Drying Processes for Pharmaceuticals: Practical Advice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pharmaceutical Research, February 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1023/b:pham.0000016234.73023.75 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaolin (Charlie) Tang, Michael J. Pikal |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,015 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
| Portugal | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 989 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 195 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 172 | 17% |
| Researcher | 122 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 111 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 43 | 4% |
| Other | 113 | 11% |
| Unknown | 259 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 164 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 123 | 12% |
| Engineering | 99 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 81 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 7% |
| Other | 180 | 18% |
| Unknown | 297 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,886,377
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#150
of 3,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,969
of 150,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.