Title |
Comparison of nine common coffee extraction methods: instrumental and sensory analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Food Research and Technology, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00217-013-1917-x |
Authors |
Alexia N. Gloess, Barbara Schönbächler, Babette Klopprogge, Lucio D`Ambrosio, Karin Chatelain, Annette Bongartz, André Strittmatter, Markus Rast, Chahan Yeretzian |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
Brazil | 1 | 8% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Comoros | 1 | 8% |
Uruguay | 1 | 8% |
Australia | 1 | 8% |
Myanmar | 1 | 8% |
Indonesia | 1 | 8% |
Mexico | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 557 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 552 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 85 | 15% |
Student > Master | 76 | 14% |
Researcher | 57 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 10% |
Other | 26 | 5% |
Other | 85 | 15% |
Unknown | 172 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 113 | 20% |
Chemistry | 72 | 13% |
Engineering | 59 | 11% |
Chemical Engineering | 19 | 3% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 3% |
Other | 74 | 13% |
Unknown | 202 | 36% |