↓ Skip to main content

Reduced energy availability: implications for bone health in physically active populations

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
50 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
366 Mendeley
Title
Reduced energy availability: implications for bone health in physically active populations
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00394-017-1498-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Papageorgiou, Eimear Dolan, Kirsty J. Elliott-Sale, Craig Sale

Abstract

The present review critically evaluates existing literature on the effects of short- and long-term low energy availability (EA) on bone metabolism and health in physically active individuals. We reviewed the literature on the short-term effects of low EA on markers of bone metabolism and the long-term effects of low EA on outcomes relating to bone health (bone mass, microarchitecture and strength, bone metabolic markers and stress fracture injury risk) in physically active individuals. Available evidence indicates that short-term low EA may increase markers of bone resorption and decrease markers of bone formation in physically active women. Bone metabolic marker responses to low EA are less well known in physically active men. Cross-sectional studies investigating the effects of long-term low EA suggest that physically active individuals who have low EA present with lower bone mass, altered bone metabolism (favouring bone resorption), reduced bone strength and increased risk for stress fracture injuries. Reduced EA has a negative influence on bone in both the short- and long-term, and every effort should be made to reduce its occurrence in physically active individuals. Future interventions are needed to explore the effects of long-term reduced EA on bone health outcomes, while short-term low EA studies are also required to give insight into the pathophysiology of bone alterations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 366 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 366 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 66 18%
Student > Master 54 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 10%
Researcher 29 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 4%
Other 45 12%
Unknown 123 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 79 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 48 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 3%
Other 34 9%
Unknown 134 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#918,749
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#264
of 2,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,813
of 325,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#8
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.