↓ Skip to main content

Empirical Prediction Intervals for County Population Forecasts

Overview of attention for article published in Population Research and Policy Review, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Empirical Prediction Intervals for County Population Forecasts
Published in
Population Research and Policy Review, February 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11113-009-9128-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Rayer, Stanley K. Smith, Jeff Tayman

Abstract

Population forecasts entail a significant amount of uncertainty, especially for long-range horizons and for places with small or rapidly changing populations. This uncertainty can be dealt with by presenting a range of projections or by developing statistical prediction intervals. The latter can be based on models that incorporate the stochastic nature of the forecasting process, on empirical analyses of past forecast errors, or on a combination of the two. In this article, we develop and test prediction intervals based on empirical analyses of past forecast errors for counties in the United States. Using decennial census data from 1900 to 2000, we apply trend extrapolation techniques to develop a set of county population forecasts; calculate forecast errors by comparing forecasts to subsequent census counts; and use the distribution of errors to construct empirical prediction intervals. We find that empirically-based prediction intervals provide reasonably accurate predictions of the precision of population forecasts, but provide little guidance regarding their tendency to be too high or too low. We believe the construction of empirically-based prediction intervals will help users of small-area population forecasts measure and evaluate the uncertainty inherent in population forecasts and plan more effectively for the future.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Japan 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 26 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 35%
Engineering 3 10%
Mathematics 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Other 8 26%
Unknown 3 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2014.
All research outputs
#6,938,918
of 24,212,485 outputs
Outputs from Population Research and Policy Review
#299
of 663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,514
of 179,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Research and Policy Review
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,212,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them