| Title |
Intensive Farming: Evolutionary Implications for Parasites and Pathogens
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Evolutionary Biology, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11692-010-9089-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adèle Mennerat, Frank Nilsen, Dieter Ebert, Arne Skorping |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Norway | 3 | <1% |
| Chile | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 300 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 57 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 48 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 14% |
| Researcher | 45 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 51 | 16% |
| Unknown | 59 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 156 | 49% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 14 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 36 | 11% |
| Unknown | 73 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,263,783
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Biology
#47
of 352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,110
of 108,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Biology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them