↓ Skip to main content

The Negros de Aras Nuée Ardente deposits: a cataclysmic eruption of Socompa volcano (Andes of Atacama, Chile)

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Volcanology, September 1978
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
The Negros de Aras Nuée Ardente deposits: a cataclysmic eruption of Socompa volcano (Andes of Atacama, Chile)
Published in
Bulletin of Volcanology, September 1978
DOI 10.1007/bf02597221
Authors

B. Deruelle

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Professor 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 80%
Environmental Science 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,534,941
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#386
of 1,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,385
of 5,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them