You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Accelerated Uplift and Magmatic Intrusion of the Yellowstone Caldera, 2004 to 2006
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, November 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.1146842 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wu-Lung Chang, Robert B. Smith, Charles Wicks, Jamie M. Farrell, Christine M. Puskas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Chile | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 22% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 9 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 100 | 78% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,149,421
of 25,391,701 outputs
Outputs from Science
#29,030
of 82,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,973
of 90,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#110
of 363 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,701 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 363 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.