↓ Skip to main content

Participant Nonnaiveté and the reproducibility of cognitive psychology

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
592 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
Title
Participant Nonnaiveté and the reproducibility of cognitive psychology
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, July 2017
DOI 10.3758/s13423-017-1348-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rolf A. Zwaan, Diane Pecher, Gabriele Paolacci, Samantha Bouwmeester, Peter Verkoeijen, Katinka Dijkstra, René Zeelenberg

Abstract

Many argue that there is a reproducibility crisis in psychology. We investigated nine well-known effects from the cognitive psychology literature-three each from the domains of perception/action, memory, and language, respectively-and found that they are highly reproducible. Not only can they be reproduced in online environments, but they also can be reproduced with nonnaïve participants with no reduction of effect size. Apparently, some cognitive tasks are so constraining that they encapsulate behavior from external influences, such as testing situation and prior recent experience with the experiment to yield highly robust effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 592 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 163 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Student > Master 22 13%
Researcher 19 12%
Other 14 9%
Professor 12 7%
Other 41 25%
Unknown 33 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 85 52%
Neuroscience 10 6%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 41 25%