↓ Skip to main content

Topography of Cerebellar Deficits in Humans

Overview of attention for article published in The Cerebellum, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
Title
Topography of Cerebellar Deficits in Humans
Published in
The Cerebellum, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/s12311-011-0247-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giuliana Grimaldi, Mario Manto

Abstract

The cerebellum is a key-piece for information processing and is involved in numerous motor and nonmotor activities, thanks to the anatomical characteristics of the circuitry, the enormous computational capabilities and the high connectivity to other brain areas. Despite its uniform cytoarchitecture, cerebellar circuitry is segregated into functional zones. This functional parcellation is driven by the connectivity and the anatomo-functional heterogeneity of the numerous extra-cerebellar structures linked to the cerebellum, principally brain cortices, precerebellar nuclei and spinal cord. Major insights into cerebellar functions have been gained with a detailed analysis of the cerebellar outputs, with the evidence that fundamental aspects of cerebrocerebellar operations are the closed-loop circuit and the predictions of future states. Cerebellar diseases result in disturbances of accuracy of movements and lack of coordination. The cerebellar syndrome includes combinations of oculomotor disturbances, dysarthria and other speech deficits, ataxia of limbs, ataxia of stance and gait, as well as often more subtle cognitive/behavioral impairments. Our understanding of the corresponding anatomo-functional maps for the human cerebellum is continuously improving. We summarize the topography of the clinical deficits observed in cerebellar patients and the growing evidence of a regional subdivision into motor, sensory, sensorimotor, cognitive and affective domains. The recently described topographic dichotomy motor versus nonmotor cerebellum based upon anatomical, functional and neuropsychological studies is also discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 180 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 19%
Researcher 35 19%
Student > Master 19 10%
Other 14 7%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 43 23%
Unknown 27 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 29%
Neuroscience 42 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 12%
Psychology 17 9%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 35 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2023.
All research outputs
#8,029,061
of 24,137,435 outputs
Outputs from The Cerebellum
#227
of 958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,453
of 202,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Cerebellum
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,137,435 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 958 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them