| Title |
Testing the Potential for Predictive Modeling and Mapping and Extending Its Use as a Tool for Evaluating Management Scenarios and Economic Valuation in the Baltic Sea (PREHAB)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-013-0479-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mats Lindegarth, Ulf Bergström, Johanna Mattila, Sergej Olenin, Markku Ollikainen, Anna-Leena Downie, Göran Sundblad, Martynas Bučas, Martin Gullström, Martin Snickars, Mikael von Numers, J. Robin Svensson, Anna-Kaisa Kosenius |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Madagascar | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 18% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 29 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 25% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2014.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#1,898
of 1,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,730
of 325,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#21
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.