↓ Skip to main content

Breaking down unitization: Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts?

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 1,593)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
28 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Breaking down unitization: Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts?
Published in
Memory & Cognition, July 2017
DOI 10.3758/s13421-017-0736-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria C. D’Angelo, Alix Noly-Gandon, Arber Kacollja, Morgan D. Barense, Jennifer D. Ryan

Abstract

Memory impairments are often observed in aging. Specifically, older adults have difficulty binding together disparate elements (relational memory). We have recently shown that a cognitive strategy known as unitization can mitigate impaired relational learning in the transverse patterning task (TP) in both amnesia and healthy aging. This strategy allows items to be fused together through an interaction such that one item acts upon another. In the context of TP, unitization is comprised of three component processes: (1) fusion, (2) motion, and (3) semantic comprehension of action/consequence sequences. Here, we examine which of these components are sufficient to mitigate age-related impairments. Four groups of older adults were given either the full unitization strategy or one of the three component strategies. Each group of older adults showed impairments in memory for the relations among items under standard training instructions relative to a threshold that marks learning of a winner-take-all rule (elemental threshold). However, participants who were given either the full unitization strategy or the action/consequence-only strategy showed improved performance, which was maintained following the 1-hour delay. Therefore, semantically rich action/consequence interactions are sufficient to mitigate age-related relational memory impairments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 31%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 49%
Neuroscience 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 13 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 243. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2017.
All research outputs
#140,131
of 23,940,484 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#6
of 1,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,225
of 317,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,940,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.