↓ Skip to main content

Blood pressure response to renal artery stenting in 901 patients from five prospective multicenter FDA‐approved trials

Overview of attention for article published in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions (Formerly Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis), November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Blood pressure response to renal artery stenting in 901 patients from five prospective multicenter FDA‐approved trials
Published in
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions (Formerly Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis), November 2013
DOI 10.1002/ccd.25263
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ido Weinberg, Michelle J. Keyes, Jay Giri, Kevin R. Rogers, Jeffrey W. Olin, Christopher J. White, Michael R. Jaff

Abstract

Renal artery stent revascularization is commonly used for renovascular hypertension. Clinical predictors associated with blood pressure (BP) improvement after renal artery stent revascularization are not well understood.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Design 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2016.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions (Formerly Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis)
#2,617
of 3,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,659
of 227,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions (Formerly Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis)
#15
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.