↓ Skip to main content

Vascular complications in diabetes: old messages, new thoughts

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
89 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
Vascular complications in diabetes: old messages, new thoughts
Published in
Diabetologia, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00125-017-4360-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josephine M. Forbes, Amelia K. Fotheringham

Abstract

In parallel with the growing diabetes pandemic, there is an increasing burden of micro- and macrovascular complications, occurring in the majority of patients. The identification of a number of synergistic accelerators of disease, providing therapeutic pathways, has stabilised the incidence of complications in most western nations. However, the primary instigators of diabetic complications and, thus, prevention strategies, remain elusive. This has necessitated a refocus on natural history studies, where tissue and plasma samples are sequentially taken to determine when and how disease initiates. In addition, recent Phase III trials, wherein the pleiotropic effects of compounds were arguably as beneficial as their glucose-lowering capacity in slowing the progression of complications, have identified knowledge gaps. Recently the influence of other widely recognised pathological pathways, such as mitochondrial production of reactive oxygen species, has been challenged, highlighting the need for a diverse and robust global research effort to ascertain viable therapeutic targets. Technological advances, such as -omics, high-resolution imaging and computational modelling, are providing opportunities for strengthening and re-evaluating research findings. Newer areas such as epigenetics, energetics and the increasing scrutiny of our synergistic inhabitants, the microbiota, also offer novel targets as biomarkers. Ultimately, however, this field requires concerted lobbying to support all facets of diabetes research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 38 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 38 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2020.
All research outputs
#844,612
of 25,389,520 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#437
of 5,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,173
of 319,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#22
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.