↓ Skip to main content

Immunohistochemical analysis of H3K27me3 demonstrates global reduction in group-A childhood posterior fossa ependymoma and is a powerful predictor of outcome

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users
patent
1 patent
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
183 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
Title
Immunohistochemical analysis of H3K27me3 demonstrates global reduction in group-A childhood posterior fossa ependymoma and is a powerful predictor of outcome
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00401-017-1752-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pooja Panwalkar, Jonathan Clark, Vijay Ramaswamy, Debra Hawes, Fusheng Yang, Christopher Dunham, Stephen Yip, Juliette Hukin, Yilun Sun, Matthew J. Schipper, Lukas Chavez, Ashley Margol, Melike Pekmezci, Chan Chung, Adam Banda, Jill M. Bayliss, Sarah J. Curry, Mariarita Santi, Fausto J. Rodriguez, Matija Snuderl, Matthias A. Karajannis, Amanda M. Saratsis, Craig M. Horbinski, Anne-Sophie Carret, Beverly Wilson, Donna Johnston, Lucie Lafay-Cousin, Shayna Zelcer, David Eisenstat, Marianna Silva, Katrin Scheinemann, Nada Jabado, P. Daniel McNeely, Marcel Kool, Stefan M. Pfister, Michael D. Taylor, Cynthia Hawkins, Andrey Korshunov, Alexander R. Judkins, Sriram Venneti

Abstract

Posterior fossa ependymomas (EPN_PF) in children comprise two morphologically identical, but biologically distinct tumor entities. Group-A (EPN_PFA) tumors have a poor prognosis and require intensive therapy. In contrast, group-B tumors (EPN_PFB) exhibit excellent prognosis and the current consensus opinion recommends future clinical trials to test the possibility of treatment de-escalation in these patients. Therefore, distinguishing these two tumor subtypes is critical. EPN_PFA and EPN_PFB can be distinguished based on DNA methylation signatures, but these assays are not routinely available. We have previously shown that a subset of poorly prognostic childhood EPN_PF exhibits global reduction in H3K27me3. Therefore, we set out to determine whether a simple immunohistochemical assay for H3K27me3 could be used to segregate EPN_PFA from EPN_PFB tumors. We assembled a cohort of 230 childhood ependymomas and H3K27me3 immunohistochemistry was assessed as positive or negative in a blinded manner. H3K27me3 staining results were compared with DNA methylation-based subgroup information available in 112 samples [EPN_PFA (n = 72) and EPN_PFB tumors (n = 40)]. H3K27me3 staining was globally reduced in EPN_PFA tumors and immunohistochemistry showed 99% sensitivity and 100% specificity in segregating EPN_PFA from EPN_PFB tumors. Moreover, H3K27me3 immunostaining was sufficient to delineate patients with worse prognosis in two independent, non-overlapping cohorts (n = 133 and n = 97). In conclusion, immunohistochemical evaluation of H3K27me3 global reduction is an economic, easily available and readily adaptable method for defining high-risk EPN_PFA from low-risk posterior fossa EPN_PFB tumors to inform prognosis and to enable the design of future clinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 133 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 17%
Other 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Student > Master 11 8%
Other 29 22%
Unknown 29 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 14%
Neuroscience 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 40 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,900,372
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#407
of 2,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,958
of 324,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#9
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.