↓ Skip to main content

Energy expenditure of interruptions to sedentary behavior

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
Title
Energy expenditure of interruptions to sedentary behavior
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-8-69
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ann M Swartz, Leah Squires, Scott J Strath

Abstract

Advances in technology, social influences and environmental attributes have resulted in substantial portions of the day spent in sedentary pursuits. Sedentary behavior may be a cause of many chronic diseases including obesity, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome. Research demonstrated that breaking up sedentary time was beneficially associated with markers of body composition, cardiovascular health and type 2 diabetes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to quantify the total energy expenditure of three different durations of physical activity within a 30-minute sedentary period and to examine the potential benefits of interrupting sedentary behavior with physical activity for weight control.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 200 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 16%
Student > Master 27 13%
Researcher 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Student > Postgraduate 16 7%
Other 48 22%
Unknown 41 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 20%
Sports and Recreations 35 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 10%
Social Sciences 13 6%
Psychology 11 5%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 51 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#869,532
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#277
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,329
of 127,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#5
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.