| Title |
Incidence of Patients with Lower Extremity Injuries Presenting to US Emergency Departments by Anatomic Region, Disease Category, and Age
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-011-1982-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kaj Lambers, Daan Ootes, David Ring |
| Abstract |
The incidence of patients with lower extremity injuries presenting to emergency departments in the United States with respect to specific anatomic regions and disease categories is unknown. Such information might be used for injury prevention, resource allocation, and training priorities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 274 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 13% |
| Other | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 61 | 22% |
| Unknown | 64 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 122 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 17 | 6% |
| Engineering | 15 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Unknown | 72 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2017.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#5,162
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,868
of 129,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#39
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.