↓ Skip to main content

Wireless Smart Infusion Pumps: A Descriptive Analysis of the Continuous Quality Improvement Data

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Wireless Smart Infusion Pumps: A Descriptive Analysis of the Continuous Quality Improvement Data
Published in
Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40846-017-0302-9
Authors

Julie Polisena, Alison Sinclair, Hal Hilfi, Mario Bédard, Art Sedrakyan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 13 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 22%
Unspecified 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Unknown 14 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2017.
All research outputs
#15,470,944
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering
#62
of 99 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,927
of 314,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.