↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of different capillary bridge models for application in the discrete element method

Overview of attention for article published in Granular Matter, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of different capillary bridge models for application in the discrete element method
Published in
Granular Matter, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10035-014-0527-z
Authors

Anton Gladkyy, Rüdiger Schwarze

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Vietnam 1 1%
Unknown 96 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 27%
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Professor 5 5%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 23 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 36 37%
Materials Science 7 7%
Chemical Engineering 6 6%
Physics and Astronomy 3 3%
Energy 2 2%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 32 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2014.
All research outputs
#20,226,756
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Granular Matter
#125
of 144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,205
of 238,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Granular Matter
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them