↓ Skip to main content

Issues in the analysis of co-authorship networks

Overview of attention for article published in Quality & Quantity, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Issues in the analysis of co-authorship networks
Published in
Quality & Quantity, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11135-011-9493-2
Authors

Domenico De Stefano, Giuseppe Giordano, Maria Prosperina Vitale

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 3 3%
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 92 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 24%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Master 9 9%
Other 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 31 31%
Computer Science 17 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 10%
Engineering 6 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 18 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,534,941
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from Quality & Quantity
#200
of 610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,158
of 109,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality & Quantity
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 610 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them