↓ Skip to main content

6-OHDA Induces Oxidation of F-box Protein Fbw7β by Chaperone-Mediated Autophagy in Parkinson’s Model

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurobiology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
6-OHDA Induces Oxidation of F-box Protein Fbw7β by Chaperone-Mediated Autophagy in Parkinson’s Model
Published in
Molecular Neurobiology, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12035-017-0686-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiufeng Wang, Heng Zhai, Fang Wang

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the most common movement disorder disease, and its pathological feature is the degenerative loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra compacta (SNc). In this study, we investigated whether distinct stress conditions target F-box protein Fbw7β via converging mechanisms. Our results showed that the 6-hyroxydopamine (6-OHDA), which causes PD in animals' models, led to decreased stability of Fbw7β in DA neuronal SN4741 cells. Further experiments suggested that oxidized Fbw7β bound to heat-shock cognate protein 70 kDa, the key regulator for chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA), at a higher affinity. Oxidative stress also increased the level of lysosomal-associated membrane protein 2A (LAMP2A), the rate-limiting receptor for CMA substrate flux, and stimulated CMA activity. These changes resulted in accelerated degradation of Fbw7β. 6-OHDA induced Fbw7β oxidation and increased LAMP2A in the SNc region of the mouse models. Consistently, the levels of oxidized Fbw7β were higher in postmortem PD brains compared with the controls. These findings for the first time revealed the specific mechanism of ubiquitin ligases, oxidative stress, and CMA-mediated protein degradation, to provide a new theoretical basis for further clarifying the mechanism of PD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Student > Master 3 19%
Other 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2019.
All research outputs
#17,906,525
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurobiology
#2,352
of 3,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,846
of 315,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurobiology
#49
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.