↓ Skip to main content

Interview Skills for Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
Title
Interview Skills for Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10803-014-2100-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lindee Morgan, Allison Leatzow, Sarah Clark, Michael Siller

Abstract

The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the efficacy of the interview skills curriculum (ISC), a manualized 12-week group-delivered intervention for young adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This intervention aims to increase social-pragmatic skills essential to a successful job interview. Twenty-eight adults (18-36 years) were randomly assigned to one of two groups: ISC or waitlist control. Results revealed that the experimental group showed larger gains in social-pragmatic skills observed during a mock job interview than the control group. Treatment effects on distal outcomes, including social adaptive behaviors and depressive symptoms were not significant, although the respective effect sizes were medium/large. Results indicate that a brief, low-intensity treatment can improve the job-interview performance of young adults with ASD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 194 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 16%
Student > Bachelor 29 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 12%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 49 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 65 33%
Social Sciences 26 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 2%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 54 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,974,437
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#814
of 5,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,332
of 242,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#12
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.