↓ Skip to main content

Mushroom as a product and their role in mycoremediation

Overview of attention for article published in AMB Express, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 1,317)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
438 Mendeley
Title
Mushroom as a product and their role in mycoremediation
Published in
AMB Express, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13568-014-0029-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shweta Kulshreshtha, Nupur Mathur, Pradeep Bhatnagar

Abstract

Mushroom has been used for consumption as product for a long time due to their flavor and richness in protein. Mushrooms are also known as mycoremediation tool because of their use in remediation of different types of pollutants. Mycoremediation relies on the efficient enzymes, produced by mushroom, for the degradation of various types of substrate and pollutants. Besides waste degradation, mushroom produced a vendible product for consumption. However, sometimes they absorb the pollutant in their mycelium (biosorption process) and cannot be consumed due to absorbed toxicants. This article reviews the achievement and current status of mycoremediation technology based on mushroom cultivation for the remediation of waste and also emphasizes on the importance of mushroom as product. This critical review is also focused on the safety aspects of mushroom cultivation on waste.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 438 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 436 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 103 24%
Student > Master 59 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 8%
Researcher 25 6%
Student > Postgraduate 15 3%
Other 60 14%
Unknown 141 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 102 23%
Environmental Science 47 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 10%
Engineering 20 5%
Chemistry 14 3%
Other 59 13%
Unknown 154 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#739,221
of 25,233,554 outputs
Outputs from AMB Express
#10
of 1,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,824
of 232,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AMB Express
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,233,554 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,317 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.