You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimal planning for mitigating the impacts of roads on wildlife
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.12243 |
| Authors |
Tal Polak, Jonathan R. Rhodes, Darryl Jones, Hugh P. Possingham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 36% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Scientists | 5 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 245 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 67 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 11% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 12% |
| Unknown | 56 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 92 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 84 | 32% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Unknown | 64 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2015.
All research outputs
#2,066,050
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#1,265
of 3,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,858
of 231,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#18
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.