↓ Skip to main content

How do bacteria sense and respond to low temperature?

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Microbiology, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
How do bacteria sense and respond to low temperature?
Published in
Archives of Microbiology, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00203-009-0539-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Shivaji, Jogadhenu S. S. Prakash

Abstract

Rigidification of the membrane appears to be the primary signal perceived by a bacterium when exposed to low temperature. The perception and transduction of the signal then occurs through a two-component signal transduction pathway consisting of a membrane-associated sensor and a cytoplasmic response regulator and as a consequence a set of cold-regulated genes are activated. In addition, changes in DNA topology due to change in temperature may also trigger cold-responsive mechanisms. Inducible proteins thus accumulated repair the damage caused by cold stress. For example, the fluidity of the rigidified membrane is restored by altering the levels of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids, by altering the fatty acid chain length, by changing the proportion of cis to trans fatty acids and by changing the proportion of anteiso to iso fatty acids. Bacteria could also achieve membrane fluidity changes by altering the protein content of the membrane and by altering the levels of the type of carotenoids synthesized. Changes in RNA secondary structure, changes in translation and alteration in protein conformation could also act as temperature sensors. This review highlights the various strategies by which bacteria senses low temperature signal and as to how it responds to the change.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 3 1%
India 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 222 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 27%
Researcher 33 14%
Student > Master 31 13%
Student > Bachelor 30 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 37 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 101 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 20%
Environmental Science 14 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 5%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 45 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2020.
All research outputs
#13,913,047
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Microbiology
#1,675
of 2,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,668
of 164,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Microbiology
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,766 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.