↓ Skip to main content

Direct visualization of HIV-enhancing endogenous amyloid fibrils in human semen

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Direct visualization of HIV-enhancing endogenous amyloid fibrils in human semen
Published in
Nature Communications, April 2014
DOI 10.1038/ncomms4508
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shariq M. Usmani, Onofrio Zirafi, Janis A. Müller, Nathallie L. Sandi-Monroy, Jay K. Yadav, Christoph Meier, Tanja Weil, Nadia R. Roan, Warner C. Greene, Paul Walther, K. Peter R. Nilsson, Per Hammarström, Ronald Wetzel, Christopher D. Pilcher, Friedrich Gagsteiger, Marcus Fändrich, Frank Kirchhoff, Jan Münch

Abstract

Naturally occurring fragments of the abundant semen proteins prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) and semenogelins form amyloid fibrils in vitro. These fibrils boost HIV infection and may play a key role in the spread of the AIDS pandemic. However, the presence of amyloid fibrils in semen remained to be demonstrated. Here, we use state of the art confocal and electron microscopy techniques for direct imaging of amyloid fibrils in human ejaculates. We detect amyloid aggregates in all semen samples and find that they partially consist of PAP fragments, interact with HIV particles and increase viral infectivity. Our results establish semen as a body fluid that naturally contains amyloid fibrils that are exploited by HIV to promote its sexual transmission.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 116 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 22%
Researcher 25 21%
Student > Master 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Professor 7 6%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 20 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 22%
Chemistry 11 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 26 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2020.
All research outputs
#534,799
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#9,458
of 46,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,349
of 226,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#77
of 476 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 476 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.