↓ Skip to main content

Novel risk genes for systemic lupus erythematosus predicted by random forest classification

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novel risk genes for systemic lupus erythematosus predicted by random forest classification
Published in
Scientific Reports, July 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-06516-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonas Carlsson Almlöf, Andrei Alexsson, Juliana Imgenberg-Kreuz, Lina Sylwan, Christofer Bäcklin, Dag Leonard, Gunnel Nordmark, Karolina Tandre, Maija-Leena Eloranta, Leonid Padyukov, Christine Bengtsson, Andreas Jönsen, Solbritt Rantapää Dahlqvist, Christopher Sjöwall, Anders A. Bengtsson, Iva Gunnarsson, Elisabet Svenungsson, Lars Rönnblom, Johanna K. Sandling, Ann-Christine Syvänen

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies have identified risk loci for SLE, but a large proportion of the genetic contribution to SLE still remains unexplained. To detect novel risk genes, and to predict an individual's SLE risk we designed a random forest classifier using SNP genotype data generated on the "Immunochip" from 1,160 patients with SLE and 2,711 controls. Using gene importance scores defined by the random forest classifier, we identified 15 potential novel risk genes for SLE. Of them 12 are associated with other autoimmune diseases than SLE, whereas three genes (ZNF804A, CDK1, and MANF) have not previously been associated with autoimmunity. Random forest classification also allowed prediction of patients at risk for lupus nephritis with an area under the curve of 0.94. By allele-specific gene expression analysis we detected cis-regulatory SNPs that affect the expression levels of six of the top 40 genes designed by the random forest analysis, indicating a regulatory role for the identified risk variants. The 40 top genes from the prediction were overrepresented for differential expression in B and T cells according to RNA-sequencing of samples from five healthy donors, with more frequent over-expression in B cells compared to T cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 27 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Computer Science 4 4%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 27 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2017.
All research outputs
#15,470,944
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#78,372
of 124,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,186
of 316,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#3,494
of 5,906 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,906 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.