↓ Skip to main content

Blood on the tracks: hematopoietic stem cell-endothelial cell interactions in homing and engraftment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Medicine, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Blood on the tracks: hematopoietic stem cell-endothelial cell interactions in homing and engraftment
Published in
Journal of Molecular Medicine, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00109-017-1559-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie R. Perlin, Audrey Sporrij, Leonard I. Zon

Abstract

Cells of the hematopoietic system undergo rapid turnover. Each day, humans require the production of about one hundred billion new blood cells for proper function. Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are rare cells that reside in specialized niches and are required throughout life to produce specific progenitor cells that will replenish all blood lineages. There is, however, an incomplete understanding of the molecular and physical properties that regulate HSC migration, homing, engraftment, and maintenance in the niche. Endothelial cells (ECs) are intimately associated with HSCs throughout the life of the stem cell, from the specialized endothelial cells that give rise to HSCs, to the perivascular niche endothelial cells that regulate HSC homeostasis. Recent studies have dissected the unique molecular and physical properties of the endothelial cells in the HSC vascular niche and their role in HSC biology, which may be manipulated to enhance hematopoietic stem cell transplantation therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 27%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 18 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 18 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,752,600
of 24,081,774 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#436
of 1,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,988
of 315,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#10
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,081,774 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.